Sponsored by
⚡ THIS WEEK'S SIGNAL
Twenty-three governors signed the Ratepayer Protection Pledge last Thursday. Two days before that, a House committee advanced the bill meant to codify it — and that bill only asks state regulators to consider making data centers pay full freight. Nobody on that stage sets your rate. Utilities and public utility commissions do, and they have been writing the binding version of this rule for a year. The pledge is the loudest layer in the stack. It is not the layer that moves money.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 MAIN STORY
The pledge got bigger. On July 23 at EPA headquarters, President Trump expanded the Ratepayer Protection Pledge that Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle and xAI first signed on March 4. The expansion brought in 23 governors — all Republicans — along with 55 utilities including Dominion, Entergy, NextEra and PG&E, 106 electric cooperatives, and roughly two dozen data center developers among them Equinix, Digital Realty and Prologis. The White House puts the coalition's reach at about 80% of the power delivered to American homes and businesses. Florida's Ron DeSantis, New Hampshire's Kelly Ayotte and Vermont's Phil Scott declined to sign. Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro and Maryland's Wes Moore — both parties to an earlier White House agreement on PJM — say they were never asked.
Read what each signatory gets out of it. Governors get to stand on the affordability side of an issue heading into the midterms without a legislature voting on anything. Hyperscalers get a national framework that costs nothing and reduces the pressure for binding state law; Matthew Freedman of the Utility Reform Network told the AP that the same companies signing in Washington are fighting data center cost bills in California. Utilities get to co-sign a document about rates they will still set through a rate case, in front of a commission the pledge does not bind. And the White House gets leverage — spokeswoman Taylor Rogers used the same week to say PJM has failed to implement a separate statement of principles, one signed by all 13 governors in the PJM footprint, Democrats included, back in January.
Virginia shows what the binding layer looks like. In November, the State Corporation Commission created a new rate class for customers over 25 MW — a bar that catches most of the roughly 450 data centers Dominion serves. Those customers sign 14-year contracts, pay minimum demand charges of 85% on transmission and distribution and 60% on generation, and post collateral of $1.5 million per megawatt. The data center side argued for $450,000. The Commission kept the higher figure. In that same order, the typical Dominion residential customer got an increase of $11.24 a month in 2026 and another $2.36 in 2027. The strongest large-load tariff in the country, and the household bill still went up. The Piedmont Environmental Council's analysis found that even under the new structure, 61% of those grid upgrade costs land on ordinary ratepayers once the 14-year term expires.
The numbers underneath are moving faster than the rhetoric. The Edison Electric Institute counted 23 states with at least one approved large-load tariff as of May 2026 and seven more pending, tracking roughly $890 billion in announced large-load investment against nearly 55 GW of connected demand. In the House markup, Rep. Julie Fedorchak put the broader figure at 36 states plus D.C. that have completed or are building large-load cost-allocation methods. ICF's May 2025 analysis projected residential rates rising 15% to 40% over five years. Georgia — whose governor stood at the podium Thursday — has had base rates frozen by PSC order through 2028 since July 2025, eight months before the pledge existed, while the December 2025 certification added 9,885 MW at an estimated $16.5 billion in construction cost.
Scenario A: H.R. 9340 gets House floor time and becomes law. It amends PURPA to make state commissions consider a large-load standard for customers at 100 MW and up. For the 23 states with a tariff already, that is a docket confirming work they finished. For states that have done nothing, it is the first forcing function — a proceeding they must open and a record they must build. Rep. Gabe Evans, the sponsor, was explicit that the bill imposes no federal mandate, so the effect concentrates entirely in the states that have been waiting.
Scenario B: The bill stalls for floor time or in the Senate. The pledge stays the only national artifact, and cost allocation remains a 50-state patchwork where a hyperscaler's exposure depends on which side of a state line the substation sits. The fight then relocates to PJM — specifically to whether the January statement of principles gets implemented, or whether the administration escalates from advisory language to pressure on board governance and the stakeholder process.
What to watch: Whether any of the 23 governors directs their commission to open a large-load cost-allocation docket before the August recess. Louisiana's Jeff Landry framed the pledge as governors pushing legislatures and commissions to act — that step is the only thing that converts a signature into a tariff.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
The first way to trade directly inside Claude and ChatGPT
For decades, the most powerful intelligence lived behind the closed doors of quant firms — billion-dollar funds whose algorithms quietly out-traded everyone else.
That era just ended.
Co-Invest by Liquid is the first way to trade directly inside Claude and ChatGPT. Ask your AI to analyze a market, stress-test an idea, or build a position sized to your comfort level, then execute, right there in the conversation. No jargon. No twelve-screen terminal. No guesswork.
It's built for people who want to invest smarter, not gamble harder. You set the risk tolerance. The AI does the heavy lifting. You approve every trade.
The institutions made the game, Co-Invest gives you a way to beat them.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚡ QUICK HITS
The codification bill cleared committee 52-0 — and asks states to "consider": House Energy and Commerce advanced H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, on July 21, amending PURPA so state commissions weigh a standard requiring 100 MW-plus loads to cover the full incremental cost of generation, transmission and distribution upgrades. Unanimous bipartisan support is real, but PURPA standards have historically been consider-and-decline mechanisms, which means the operative question is floor scheduling, not vote count. congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9340
New York paused hyperscale permitting for a year: Governor Hochul signed Executive Order 62 on July 14, halting state environmental permits for new data centers at 50 MW and above for up to twelve months while DPS builds a Generic Environmental Impact Statement and runs the Energize NY proceeding on whether data centers pay more or self-supply. For developers with New York sites in diligence, discretionary DEC permits are the exposure point — the Governor's office confirmed those projects are expected to be affected. governor.ny.gov
Virginia's collateral requirement bites January 1: The GS-5 contract provisions apply to service agreements signed on or after January 1, 2027, meaning $1.5 million per megawatt in posted collateral plus 14-year minimum terms and exit fees. Anyone underwriting a Dominion-territory site through year-end is working against a deadline that materially changes project cost of capital. scc.virginia.gov
The White House is publicly pressuring PJM on governance: Rogers said the administration strongly advises PJM to reform its stakeholder process and board governance and implement the January statement of principles. That statement — reported to include two-year price caps on future capacity auctions — carries bipartisan gubernatorial signatures the July pledge does not, which makes it the more consequential document of the two. pbs.org
Georgia's protection predates the pledge by eight months: The PSC ordered Georgia Power base rates frozen through at least the end of 2028 in July 2025, and a fuel and storm cost settlement effective June 1, 2026 returned roughly $4 a month to typical residential customers, about $285 million annually system-wide. The freeze covers base rates only — fuel, storm recovery and rider mechanisms remain live, and a rate case is expected in 2028. gpb.org
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔧 TOOL / RESOURCE OF THE WEEK
Virginia SCC — Data Center Initiatives Fact Sheet: A short primary-source summary of the GS-5 rate class, minimum charges, contract terms and collateral requirements the Commission approved in November. It is the template most other states are copying, so if you want to read the tariff language that the next twenty commissions will borrow from, read this one rather than the summaries of it. → scc.virginia.gov
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💬 CLOSING THOUGHT
Something is genuinely shifting here. Twenty-three states with tariffs on the books, a 52-0 committee vote, a governor pausing permits — that is not nothing, and none of it happened in 2023. What I cannot tell yet is whether last Thursday accelerated any of it or just narrated it. A signature at EPA headquarters and a docket number at a state commission are not the same instrument, and only one of them shows up in a rate case.
So I'm curious what you're seeing on the ground. Will the pledge push your commission to move faster? Or does it give them cover to wait?
